Vendor questionnaires, insurance certificates, cybersecurity reviews, and procurement checks all serve an important purpose. But they may not reveal the full public-record, financial, regulatory, or reputational picture.
True Court Screening Solutions helps organizations independently evaluate third parties using commercial data, public records, and investigative research.
Different sources answer different questions. We bring them together to help you better understand the organization you may be relying on.
Entity verification, registrations, ownership information, key principals, and related business information.
Civil litigation, bankruptcy, adversary proceedings, judgments, liens, UCC filings, and related records.
Commercial business credit data can provide insight into payment patterns, financial stress indicators, collections, and overall credit risk.
Global sanctions, watchlists, regulatory actions, enforcement activity, and other compliance-related risk indicators.
Targeted research for reputational concerns, negative media, significant controversies, and other relevant public information.
When appropriate, extend the review to owners and key principals, including public records, sanctions, adverse media, OSINT, and social media research.
For higher-risk relationships, screening the business
alone may not provide enough context. True Court can
extend due diligence to owners, executives, and other
key principals where appropriate.
Screening can be tailored based on the size of the relationship, access to sensitive information, geographic exposure, reputational risk, and overall importance to your organization.
Core entity verification, public-record research, sanctions, bankruptcy, liens, and adverse media.
Adds deeper litigation research, regulatory review, business credit, ownership analysis, and expanded reputational research.
Designed for higher-risk relationships and can include extensive principal screening, social media, OSINT, and expanded investigative research.
Evaluate a prospective vendor before entering the relationship.
Apply deeper diligence when exposure or dependency increases.
Refresh risk information on key or higher-risk relationships.
Investigate ownership changes, litigation, media issues, or other warning signs.
Vendor and third-party due diligence can look different depending on the relationship, level of risk, and type of organization being reviewed. Below are answers to some of the most common questions about how True Court approaches vendor and third-party risk screening.
Vendor and third-party due diligence is the process of evaluating a company, organization, or business partner before or during a commercial relationship. Depending on the scope, it may include business verification, public-record research, commercial data, litigation history, sanctions screening, regulatory research, adverse media, and review of key principals.
True Court can conduct due diligence on vendors, suppliers, contractors, consultants, professional service providers, franchisees, distributors, strategic partners, acquisition targets, and other third parties involved in a business relationship.
A review may include business identity and registration, ownership and key principals, civil litigation, bankruptcy, judgments and liens, UCC filings, business credit, regulatory and enforcement activity, sanctions and watchlists, adverse media, and other relevant public or commercial information.
Yes. When appropriate, due diligence can be expanded beyond the business entity to include owners, executives, and other key principals. This may include identity research, criminal and civil court records, bankruptcies, judgments and liens, sanctions, PEP screening, adverse media, professional licenses, social media, and other open-source research.
Yes. These components can be included based on the scope of the engagement. Business credit can provide additional financial risk indicators, while sanctions, adverse media, social media, and other open-source research can help identify regulatory, reputational, or integrity-related concerns.
Yes. Not every third party requires the same level of review. True Court can tailor the scope based on factors such as the size and importance of the relationship, access to sensitive information, geographic exposure, reputational risk, regulatory considerations, and other relevant risk factors.
Periodic reviews may be appropriate for higher-risk or important third-party relationships. Additional due diligence may also be considered when there are ownership changes, significant litigation, regulatory activity, financial concerns, negative media, or other developments that may affect the relationship.
Whether you’re evaluating a new vendor, reviewing an existing third party, or conducting
enhanced due diligence on a higher-risk relationship, True Court can build a review around the
level of risk you need to understand.
